Journal of Tax Reform
Relationship Between the Tax Burden Structure and Citizens’ Welfare in OECD Countries
A.A. Pugachev
P.G. Demidov Yаroslavl State University, Yаroslavl, Russian Federation
Abstract
This research aims to examine the correlation between the tax burden structure and citizens’ welfare in OECD countries in 2020 and 2021. The hypothesis tested suggests an interconnection between the tax burden structure and citizen welfare, particularly a direct relationship between the income tax share and welfare, and an inverse relationship between the share of indirect taxes and welfare. The study employs correlation-regression, cluster, and structural analysis methods, along with data from OECD.Stat and the World Bank. The calculations were performed by using the “Data Analysis” package in MS Excel for the years 2000, 2018–2019, and 2021. The resulting dataset, comprising 1,540 indicators of welfare and tax burden structure across 38 OECD countries, confirmed a significant connection between the two. The income tax share exhibited the most pronounced unidirectional relationship with welfare, while the share of indirect taxes showed a negative correlation. Conversely, the share of the corporate income tax, property taxes, and social security contributions displayed non-significant correlations with welfare levels. To further categorize OECD countries, the k-means method and the DATAtab web tool were employed based on the parameters of the relationship between welfare and the tax burden structure. In high-income OECD countries, the income tax share averages 37.6%, with indirect taxes comprising 24.1% while in lower-income countries the share of the income tax is 6–20% (average 14.8%), with indirect taxes comprising 35–53% (average 39.7%) of the tax burden. To foster the growth of citizens’ welfare in Russia, it is advisable to increase the share of the income tax by enhancing the progressivity of its scale for the super-rich while maintaining the share of indirect taxes at the pre-crisis average level (≈25%).
Keywords
citizen welfare, tax burden structure, income tax, indirect taxes, property taxes
JEL classification
H21, H24, I31References
1. Hicks J. The Foundations of Welfare Economics. Economic Journal. 1939;49(196):696–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2225023
2. Pareto V. Cours d’économie politique. Vol. 2. Lausanne: F. Rouge; 1897. 426 p. Available at: https://ia903402.us.archive.org/30/items/fp-0148-2/FP0148_2.pdf (accessed: 27.06.2023).
3. Aydin N. Pareto efficiency in individualistic vs. altruistic society. Humanomics. 2014;30(4):304–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-01-2013-0004
4. Pigou A. The Economics of Welfare. (4th ed.) London: Macmillan; 1920. 551 p. Available at: http://pombo.free.fr/pigou1920.pdf (accessed: 04.07.2023).
5. Galbraith J.K. Galbraith: a Partisan Appraisal. In: Laperche B., Uzunidis D. (eds) John Kenneth Galbraith and the Future of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523708_2
6. Myrdal G. Beyond the welfare state. Science and Society. 1962;26(1):91–95. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40018457 (accessed: 27.06.2023).
7. Stiglitz, J. The price of inequality: how today’s divided society endangers our future. New York; 2012. 560 р. Available at: http://resistir.info/livros/stiglitz_the_price_of_inequality.pdf (accessed: 27.06.2023).
8. Piketti T. Capital in XXI century. Cambridge Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2014. 696 р. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279415000616
9. Milanovic B. Global Inequality: New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2016. 300 p. Available at: http://resistir.info/livros/global_inequality.pdf (accessed: 02.07.2023).
10. Banerjee A., Duflo E. Good Economics for Hard Times: Better Answers to Our Biggest Problems. New York: PublicАffairs; 2019. 432 p. Available at: https://www.goodeconomicsforhardtimes.com/ (accessed: 27.06.2023).
11. Towsend P. Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. New York: University of California Press; 1979. 126 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700108393
12. Sen A. The standard of Living. Cambridge: Cambridge University of Press; 1987. 125 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100001334
13. Guriev S., Treisman D. Informational Autocrats. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2019;33(4):100–127. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.100
14. Corak М. Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2013;27(3):79–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/41955546
15. De la Croix D., Doepke M. Inequality and Growth: Why Differential Fertility Matters. American Economic Review. 2003;93(4):1091–1113. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803769206214
16. Fidrmuc J., Gundacke, L. Income inequality and oligarchs in Russian regions: A note. European Journal of Political Economy. 2017;50:196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.ejpoleco.2017.09.005
17. Karadjova V., Trajkov А. Basic economic indicators and economic well-being. Horizons– International Scientific Journal. 2022;31(2):165–181. https://doi.org/10.20544/horizons.a.31.2.22.p13
18. Dorofeev M. Comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of social security regional financial models in Russia based on the DEA method. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2023;6:117–137. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-6-117-137
19. Kalimeris P., Bithas K., Richardson C., Nijkamp, P. Hidden linkages between resources and economy: A “Beyond-GDP” approach using alternative welfare indicators. Ecological Economics. 2020;169:106508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106508
20. Jin H., Jakovljevic M. Fiscal decentralization and the Human Development Index: a cross-border empirical study. Sustainability. 2023;15(11):8784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118784
21. Puzule A. Research on the Personal Income Tax Application to Wages in the Baltic States. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. 2019;6:654–664. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol6.3858
22. Romane-Jersova А., Kotane I. The impact of the labor tax burden on the living standard of the inhabitants of Latvia. Journal of Regional Economic and Social Development. 2020;1(12):97–106. https://doi.org/10.17770/jresd2020vol1.12.5388
23. Vylkova Е. Palette Effect of Taxes on Economic, Social and Emotional Welfare of the Citizens. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;166:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.512
24. Lulaj E., Dragusha B. Incomes, Gaps and Well-Being: an Exploration of Direct Tax Income Statements Before and During Covid-19 Through the Comparability Interval. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2022;7(6):1–31. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i6.623
25. Rothschild C., Scheuer F. Redistributive Taxation in the Roy Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2013;128(2):623–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs076
26. Bourguignon F., Spadaro A. Tax Benefit Revealed Social Preferences. Journal of Economic Inequality. 2012;10(1):75–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9153-0
27. Conesa J., Krueger D. On the optimal progressivity of the income tax code. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2006;53(7):1425–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.03.016
28. Benedek D., Benítez J., C., Vellutin C. Progress of the Personal Income Tax in Emerging Markets and Developing Countries. IMF Working Papers. 2022;(20):1–36. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400201134.001
29. Shephard A., Blundell R. Employment, Hours of Work and the Optimal Taxation of Low-Income Families. Review of Economic Studies. 2012;79(2):1–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/23261341
30. Koroleva L. Impact of Value Added Tax on Macro-Economic Parameters of the Russian Economy. Journal of Tax Reform. 2020;6(1):22–35. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.1.073
31. Haibara T. Indirect Tax Reform in Developing Countries: A Consumption-Neutral Approach. Journal of Globalization and Development. 2017;8(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2016-0036
32. Pugachev A. The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia. Journal of Tax Reform. 2023;9(1):19–33. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.126
33. Muinelo-Gallo L.; Roca-Sagalés O. Joint determinants of fiscal policy, income inequality and economic growth. Economic Modelling. 2013;30:814–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.009
34. Guillaud E., Olckers M., Zemmour M. Four levers of redistribution: The impact of tax and transfer systems on inequality reduction. Review of Income and Wealth. 2020;66(2):444–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12408
35. Pugachev A.A. Impact of the Level and Structure of the Tax Burden on Citizens Inequality. Financial Journal. 2023;15(3):59–77. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-3-59-77
36. Ikotun A.M., Ezugwu A.E., Abualigah L., Abuhaija B., Heming J. K-means clustering algorithms: a comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the area of big data. Information Sciences. 2023;622(11):178–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.139
37. Loog M., Krijthe J.H., Bicego M. Also for k-means: more data does not imply better performance. Machine Learning. 2023;112:3033–3050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-023-06361-6
38. Laffer A.B. The Laffer Curve: Past, Present, and Future. The Heritage Foundation Publications. 2004;(1765):1–16. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/taxes/report/the-laffer-curve-past-present-and-future (accessed: 02.07.2023).
39. Halim M.A., Rahman M.M. The effect of taxation on sustainable development goals: evidence from emerging countries. Heliyon. 2022;8(9):e10512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10512
40. Mayburov, I.A. Marking the Centenary of Income Tax in Russia: Theoretical Analysis of Key Stages of the Reform. Journal of Tax Reform. 2015;1(2-3):161–176. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2015.1.2.010
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 23-28-00365, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-28-00365/
About Authors
Andrey A. Pugachev – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Researcher, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University (14 Sovetskaya str., Yaroslavl, 150003), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-6353; e-mail: andrxim@yandex.ru
For citation
Pugachev A.A. Relationship Between the Tax Burden Structure and Citizens’ Welfare in OECD Countries. Journal of Tax Reform. 2023;9(3):343–358. doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.3.146
Article info
Received July 20, 2023; Revised September 22, 2023; Accepted October 15, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.3.146
Download full text article:
~585 KB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
17.12.2023)
Created / Updated: 31 August 2015 / 3 July 2017
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
ISSN 2414-9497 (online)